November 13, 2020

The controversy regarding amendments to patent applications in Brazil – A new chapter begins

As reported in our Newsletter #06, sent in March 2019, the Public Civil Action filed in 2002 by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (PPO) generated heated debates around the interpretation of section 32 of the Industrial Property Act (IPA – Law #9,279/1996) concerning the examination of patent applications.

In summary, the PPO argued that voluntary changes to the scope of the claims of a patent application, by (restrict) interpretation of section 32 of the IPA, could only be submitted until the examination request. Even so, this amendment request should be limited to the matter initially revealed in the application.

For further information, click below to access our full newsletter.

See file

Back

Last related news

September 24, 2024

Brazilian CNPQ defines Intellectual Property guidelines for funded inventions

The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ), through CNPQ Ordinance No. 1,935 (“Ordinance”), dated September 20, 2024, has established … Brazilian CNPQ defines Intellectual Property guidelines for funded inventions

September 19, 2024

Updates on procedures for ownership transfers and amendments to patent holder informations

Updates on procedures for transferring ownership and changing the name/company name, address/headquarters, and security interest or pledge of patent holders of any … Updates on procedures for ownership transfers and amendments to patent holder informations

Flávia Benzatti Tremura Polli Rodrigues

September 19, 2024

Brazilian Superior Court decides on the non-remunerative nature of stock option plans

On September 11, 2024, in its ruling on Case No. 1226, the Brazilian Superior Court (STJ) determined that gains derived from stock … Brazilian Superior Court decides on the non-remunerative nature of stock option plans